What Elisabetta Canalis did next - part 3 reboot

She seems to be ding really well for herself post George, good for her.

It takes courage to say that Cindy and Stacey are better than Ely!! Cindy seems to me a form with the botox that has been made, Stacey is a woman without class, and are useless his attempts to be wearing designer clothes, has way to go to reach Elizabeth who is, of course, is refined and always glamorous

Neither Stacey nor Elisabetta are of the same calibre as Cindy.
CC has what it took to make it as a supermodel. Appearance alone.
The other two are just desperate to become famous, plain & rough-looking fitness devotees. Far from being classy, talented or glamorous.
But these may be the types George likes.

@kim18 - yeah, real class covered in tattoos, androgynous, acting as a nun getting her breast fondled & being named as allegedly frequenting Milanese nightclubs to snort blow with other prostitutes.

Both her & Stacey are in the same league. The latter has an abundance of sordid images online too.

Cindy Crawford is an admirable woman who looks younger than both these Clooney girlfriends. She foolishly gets Botox probably through ill advice as its toxic & hardens her, IMO.
But so do Clooney's last two girlfriends.

Cynisca wrote:Neither Stacey nor Elisabetta are of the same calibre as Cindy.
CC has what it took to make it as a supermodel. Appearance alone.
The other two are just desperate to become famous, plain & rough-looking fitness devotees. Far from being classy, talented or glamorous.
But these may be the types George likes.

@kim18 - yeah, real class covered in tattoos, androgynous, acting as a nun getting her breast fondled & being named as allegedly frequenting Milanese nightclubs to snort blow with other prostitutes.

Both her & Stacey are in the same league. The latter has an abundance of sordid images online too.

Cindy Crawford is an admirable woman who looks younger than both these Clooney girlfriends. She foolishly gets Botox probably through ill advice as its toxic & hardens her, IMO.
But so do Clooney's last two girlfriends.

You always speak first to be aware of the fact, Elizabeth is 14 years ago that what he is doing today, and I believe that his work does not have to thank anyone but herself. Cindy was a great model, but now (see his twitt) living in the past because of twitter continues to post his photos many years ago. Today is struggling to have a natural expression because the botox has probably paralyzed her facial muscles!

Scusi, but Virgin Territory was in 2007, not 14 years ago.

Also, the drug allegations refer to her hanging out with prostitutes in Milanese clubs in 2007. Che sopresso!
Before she was shortlisted as Clooney's girlfriend.

The fact is, Cindy Crawford was & still is beautiful & successful because of that. Elisabetta & Stacey are not and never were. Just wannabe party girls, hellbent on fame & glory at all costs. So they work out manically to sell "fit." Cause that's all they have. Because beauty never cracked it for them to make it as models or actresses.
And surely inner beauty & intelligence is lacking for their pasts alone contradict the concept. Just my opinion... of course....

conference press for lormar[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Another photoshopped pic. Touches out the many imperfections.
Stacey uses it too. Betta looks less like Steven Tyler in this photo, IMO.

She's no Monica Bellucci or Sophia Loren, that's for sure.
Probably that's why she's a peripheral.... entertainer.

Poor Betta could only ever get attention half-naked and leaning on a steering wheel of a boat to perk up her flat derriere. And not showing her short bandy legs.
Not a hot body, & that's all she aims to sell.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Yes, Clooney's taste in his last two girlfriends has been.... IMO ( & the general consensus )


No supermodel, nor actress...

Cynisca wrote:Scusi, but Virgin Territory was in 2007, not 14 years ago.

Also, the drug allegations refer to her hanging out with prostitutes in Milanese clubs in 2007. Che sopresso!
Before she was shortlisted as Clooney's girlfriend.

The fact is, Cindy Crawford was & still is beautiful & successful because of that. Elisabetta & Stacey are not and never were. Just wannabe party girls, hellbent on fame & glory at all costs. So they work out manically to sell "fit." Cause that's all they have. Because beauty never cracked it for them to make it as models or actresses.
And surely inner beauty & intelligence is lacking for their pasts alone contradict the concept. Just my opinion... of course....

Elisabetta works in Italy from 1998 , Italy is small and not as large as America but it seems to pay very well judging by all the commercials that George runs in Italy! and Cindy where she became famous? Cindy has become famous for the runways in Europe (milan and Paris) and for marrying Richard Gere. Do not forget!

Cindy Crawford is an international icon. A household name.
Elisabetta Canalis is virtually unknown. A non-entity in the international celebrity scene. And if it wasn't for George, no one would know who she is today. In fact, most have forgotten.

A little bit of this, a little bit of whatever entertainment she could get.
Not beautiful.
Not talented.
No education.
Not sexy.

Can't even dance, cook, or act

I made my points in previous statements. Ciao!

Cynisca wrote:Cindy Crawford is an international icon. A household name.
Elisabetta Canalis is virtually unknown. A non-entity in the international celebrity scene. And if it wasn't for George, no one would know who she is today. In fact, most have forgotten.

A little bit of this, a little bit of whatever entertainment she could get.
Not beautiful.
Not talented.
No education.
Not sexy.

Can't even dance, cook, or act

I made my points in previous statements. Ciao!

Cindy Crawford depicted in a caricature alongside Leonardo DiCaprio and Arnold Schwarzenegger
In 1989 he signed a contract of $ 3,000,000 for 3 years with the cosmetics giant Revlon. Cindy will be the face of Revlon for 11 years until 2000. From 1989 to 1995, Cindy was a guest of the MTV program, House of Style. In 1992, in Norway, were removed billboards with his image when the authorities recorded an increase of 300% of accidents due to driver distractions. In 1994 he appears in the video Please come home for christmas the famous singer Jon Bon Jovi.Nel 1995, the model had his first role as an actress in the film Fair Game (Easy Prey), whose performance was rejected by critics, so that the film was a total failure. In the same year he became ambassador of Omega watches in the world that still represents. In 2002 he launched his first perfume "Cindy Crawford" with the cosmetic giant Wella, followed by "feminine", "Waterfalls" and "Summerday." In 2005 he launched a line of home furnishings, "Cindy Crawford Home" with the giant americamo "Rooms to go."
Crawford is 1.76 cm high, has a slim and toned figure, with eyes and brown hair. Her measurements are 87-59-90. It was the first supermodel to pose nude for Playboy, whose ranking of the hundred sexiest women of the twentieth century saw the fifth. It has been on the covers of magazines most famous, such as Vogue, W, People, ELLE, Allure. In 2002, Cindy was defined by a People of the 50 most beautiful women in the world. What made it popular has contributed a series of videos with the gymnastics of his personal trainer, who had the most success of the film Fair Game, which he saw as the protagonist. Still continuing his career with a series of initiatives. In the 2009 rankings of the 50 sexiest people of the 90s, was ranked third.

from wikipedia, Cindy was a good model (I stress was) now is a good imprendritice (perhaps also takes advantage of the 10 year old daughter)

This is Cindy 3 months ago (Oct. 12). To me she is beautiful, classy lady with very delicate features even without makeup. She is also a smart businesswoman, a partner with French dermatologist, Dr. Sebagh in the cosmetic line Meaningful Beauty, plus she has a husband and two children.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

don't forget that cindy was supermodel and really beautiful before the photoshop era begin unlike elisabetta which all her pix in mags even before G is Photoshopped in face or body and CC face is beautiful , EC face isn't as beautiful or special , u can call EC pretty girl only in make up not beautiful .

i would turn to look at CC twice if i met her in street but it's normal to see EC specially that EC talent ONLY is to be in her underwear , pose naked and that she is not fat , at least SK not so beautiful but have spectacular legs !

when EC not in bikini or posing in under wears and wears covered clothes like ever woman ppl call her ugly and tranny !
sorry lela , your case of Elisabetta is lost , CC is out of elisabetta league .

Lets not forget though that Cindy appeared in playboy early in her career to boost her career. Not that far removed from what Stacy and Eli have done in their pasts.

Good point TNMC

Cindy is a beautiful woman (even if today is a little expressionless for botox), I never said or thought differently and was a talented and beautiful model but did nude photos, she posed for Playboy. I just wanted to remove the halo of holy Cindy here that someone had given

CC posed for Playboy in a sensual, artistic way as an already established model. Not like a borderline-unattractive, sleazy nobody trying to sell sexy, heavily photoshopping her many defects out & still appearing insignificant.
Neither Betta nor Stacey have ever been models. They never made it as such.
Cavalli dropped Canalis as soon as her relationship with George was over.

No, lelacorb, I haven't sanctified CC's image. Just stated that Canalis & Keibler are not in her league, nor ever will be.

@ lolo- take a good look at Stacey's legs. They're far from "spectacular." If her PR spins "sexy" you only need not believe the hype. Observe.
Nadja Auermann was a model who took the world by storm because of her perfectly long legs, by comparison.
Stacey has length; goes with her height. Not a great shape; awfully masculine but slightly better than Betta's short, crooked legs.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Btw, Betta's Instagram photo above has so much editing, it's faded out her face to the point she's unrecognizable.

I make no reservations about criticizing the arppearance of those who put themselves in the public eye, desperately seeking publicity to sell sordid images of sex appeal.

So basically CC gets a pass in your eyes on posing in Playboy because you view her as attractive and her posing was sensual and artistic -

Have no idea what the point is in comparing CC/SK/EC/SL etc etc etc to each other.

One thing I find a bit disturbing is CC's constant need to post pictures of herself from her modelling days - her facebook and twitter account is littered with photos from the 80's and 90's. Perhaps her attempt at trying to stay relevant but I do find it a bit sad.

@ Theminis - No the point is that CC was already a successful supermodel at the time she posed for Playboy in 1988. Photos were sensual & soft. Not sleazy & desperate. That shoot was in addition to her extensive commercial photographic work. It was brought up as an example of "compromised morality" by OP, in comparison to Betta's nun titty-fondling plum role & other cheap shots. Or Stacey's violent wrestling & lollipop sucking trashy photos.

Why CC was drawn into this thread initially is because OP suggested Betta is another younger CC. In fact, Betta is 12 years younger than CC & looks older. So does Stacey.

Conversation went off on a tangent as lelacorb proceeded to promote Betta.

Agreed, CC is overdoing Tweeting past photos of herself. Maybe it's her PR, though.

If you think that posing for pornography is wrong and a sign of poor character (not my opinion, but one that I've seen made several times) then you have to accept that it's wrong. Makes no difference whether it's sensual or if you're an established supermodel at the time, pornography is pornography.

lolo wrote:don't forget that cindy was supermodel and really beautiful before the photoshop era

Don't you believe it. Images in fashion magazines have been manipulated since forever - it was called airbrushing then. Cindy herself says that in early photos of her, her mole was often removed from her pictures because it was considered ugly. Photoshop is only a computerised way of doing something that was being done already. This doesn't take anything away from the fact that Cindy Crawford is acknowledged as one of the most beautiful women of her time.

I had forgotten that Katie- I remember now in one interview, she said that she didn't know that the mole had been airbrushed out until magazine hit the stands.

theminis wrote:So basically CC gets a pass in your eyes on posing in Playboy because you view her as attractive and her posing was sensual and artistic -

Have no idea what the point is in comparing CC/SK/EC/SL etc etc etc to each other.

One thing I find a bit disturbing is CC's constant need to post pictures of herself from her modelling days - her facebook and twitter account is littered with photos from the 80's and 90's. Perhaps her attempt at trying to stay relevant but I do find it a bit sad.

I completely agree with you! Maybe he misses, probably his mirror does not lie, it is still a beautiful woman!

to understand this better ... today

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


yesterday

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Pretty woman but today she does not show 30 years

Elisabetta Canalis press Conference for Lormar
pics
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
35 pics from Zimbio
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

lelacorb wrote:to understand this better ... today

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


yesterday

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Pretty woman but today she does not show 30 years

Lela, these are the worst pictures of CC that I have ever seen. Naturally not all the pictures are perfect, even the ones of Elisabetta. At the Lormar interview you posted beautiful photos although to get that beautiful Ms. Canalis is now wearing lots of makep with three sets of eyelashes and the friendly photoshop (Lormar showed in a video how they do it); however on the same night this picture was also taken and she does not look that hot (long nose, scrawny cheeks).
You also posted photos of CC at age 47 and Elisabetta is 35. I doubt that Elisabetta will be as beautiful as CC at age 47.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Nice that you found one bad photo of Cindy, lelacorb. I think she may have learnt by now to stop using Botox as she doesn't need it.

The Casamigos ad is recent, & you can see Cindy is still an ageless & beautiful woman, even under the soft camera lens & dim lighting George Clooney used.

lelacorb- I see you're veering off to promote Elisabetta again. I won't indulge you to post about someone so insignificant. Most people don't know who she is, nor that she dated Clooney part time, once upon a Moon.

But if it's comments you seek to keep her relevant, last waste of time:
In photos above -
She's gone overboard with the false eyelashes & hair extensions.
Her legs are so short & bow-legged, that maybe she should wear longer leggings as an illusion, no?? And a bottom lift to fight gravity.
Her stylist needs to blot out the grease off her oily complexion.
And what's with the wrinkles?

Arriverderci!

socimar wrote:

lelacorb wrote:to understand this better ... today

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]


yesterday

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Pretty woman but today she does not show 30 years

Lela, these are the worst pictures of CC that I have ever seen. Naturally not all the pictures are perfect, even the ones of Elisabetta. At the Lormar interview you posted beautiful photos although to get that beautiful Ms. Canalis is now wearing lots of makep with three sets of eyelashes and the friendly photoshop (Lormar showed in a video how they do it); however on the same night this picture was also taken and she does not look that hot (long nose, scrawny cheeks).
You also posted photos of CC at age 47 and Elisabetta is 35. I doubt that Elisabetta will be as beautiful as CC at age 47.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I never had the intention to compare Elizabeth Cindy Crawford, I never said that they resemble (read the post), I posted photos of Cindy only to deny that it looks like a 30 year old woman, she brings worthily its 46 years and is seen mostly without makeup! The pictures I posted of Elizabeth have nothing to do with Cindy Crawford. I do not see any link between the two!

Cynisca wrote:Nice that you found one bad photo of Cindy, lelacorb. I think she may have learnt by now to stop using Botox as she doesn't need it.

The Casamigos ad is recent, & you can see Cindy is still an ageless & beautiful woman, even under the soft camera lens & dim lighting George Clooney used.

lelacorb- I see you're veering off to promote Elisabetta again. I won't indulge you to post about someone so insignificant. Most people don't know who she is, nor that she dated Clooney part time, once upon a Moon.

But if it's comments you seek to keep her relevant, last waste of time:
In photos above -
She's gone overboard with the false eyelashes & hair extensions.
Her legs are so short & bow-legged, that maybe she should wear longer leggings as an illusion, no?? And a bottom lift to fight gravity.
Her stylist needs to blot out the grease off her oily complexion.
And what's with the wrinkles???

But, hey, kudos to her for trying to look sexy, fab & superstar famous. Failing... But still working on it...even smiling.

Besides, I love Aerosmith, and think Steven Tyler is kind of cute.

Arriverderci!

if placed on Elizabeth is why this tread is dedicated to her if you do not care do not do it, it's so simple, you can save time and also become acidic for any reason!

Is really stupid to compare Cindy than 20 years ago with photos of Elisabetta today! However, I repeat that nonsense that neither Stacey Cindy will have the charm and sophistication of Elisabetta.

kim18 wrote:Is really stupid to compare Cindy than 20 years ago with photos of Elisabetta today! However, I repeat that nonsense that neither Stacey Cindy will have the charm and sophistication of Elisabetta.

Dream on!! Cindy achieved iconic status as a supermodel for being beautiful.
EC & SK are in the same league of Z-list irrelevance. Accept it! The proof is in the pudding & you can spin as much as you like.

Elisabetta never became anything other than a desperate peripheral entertainer... Only George Clooney's name catapulted her on the international scene many years ago. But she's faded into obscurity again.

I wouldn't be surprised if she has 80% fake Twitter followers given how desperate she is to be a 'superstar."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Socimar wrote

You also posted photos of CC at age 47 and Elisabetta is 35. I doubt that Elisabetta will be as beautiful as CC at age 47.

Cindy, 47, already looks younger and more beautiful than Elisabetta 35, at present.
Biologically, Cindy looks 29-30 (when the Botox has worn off); Stacey & Betta 42-45.

P.S. Lo & behold! What's with Betta's double chin above the Adam's Apple in the photos lelacorb posted? Hello!! And the deep nasolabial fold crevices? Who forgot to airbrush that out???
Case closed.

Cynisca wrote:Socimar wrote

You also posted photos of CC at age 47 and Elisabetta is 35. I doubt that Elisabetta will be as beautiful as CC at age 47.

Cindy, 47, already looks younger and more beautiful than Elisabetta 35, at present.
Biologically, Cindy looks 29-30 (when the Botox has worn off); Stacey & Betta 42-45.

P.S. Lo & behold! What's with Betta's double chin above the Adam's Apple in the photos lelacorb posted? Hello!! And the deep nasolabial fold crevices? Who forgot to airbrush that out???
Case closed.

You suffer from heartburn, do not digest, I'm sorry!

Mi dispiace, no capisco! But I made relevant points!
The truth bites! And you know it.

Well, the web is going wild about Elisabetta's hole/rip in her pants (near the crotch) during the Lormar interview. You can see it a little in the pictures that Lelacorb posted especially Picture #4 and a bit #5 but now the web has enlarged pictures of the area.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Also during the same evening that the pictures of Lelacorb were taken they have some where Elisabetta looks older than 50 (see below), this is to demonstrate that you can have a good or a bad pictures and the ones above of Cindy are just bad because she is indeed a beautiful woman.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Only 50? one hundred is better! Don't you think?

video of old and ugly Ely!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is it handbags at dawn then ?

lelacorb wrote:video of old and ugly Ely!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I listened to it but she doesn't say anything new. The best way to seduce a man is to be "INDIFFERENT", that she feels Italian 100% but..........she has chosen to live in LA and hopes to have success here, etc...

Anyway she is already here!

ElisabettaCanalisVerified ‏@JustElisabetta
I love landing in this town! #LosAngeles #love #California [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
12:16 PM - 23 Jan 13

kim18 wrote:Is really stupid to compare Cindy than 20 years ago with photos of Elisabetta today! However, I repeat that nonsense that neither Stacey Cindy will have the charm and sophistication of Elisabetta.

ROFL REALLY YOU ARE FUNNY LOOOL.
what are you drinking lately?
are you elisabetta ppr or her

Elisabetta also have noticed with torn leggings is glamorous .. there is nothing you can do when you have class ...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

that's so funny Elisabetta and classy LOOOL ! embarrassing

Oh my God!Akward!! I don't think she did that on purpose! This is what happen when you wear some smaller seize dress to look thinner than you are! She would be classy???? VERY EMBARASSING & TRASHY!!

I voted number 6....Lol

So, are we done bitching about her now?

Can't compare these two, CC had a different career than EC, she was with Revlon for along time and that was considered late in her career, she walked runways, cover for mags, what has EC done in 35 years that can compare? CC also a sharp business woman,now is doing furniture and houseware lines, she keeps working as she matures and ages. EC is a beautiful woman but with a different lifestyle, CC slowed down her parting etc. when she became a mom.EC doesn't seem to have slowed down her party. Wish CC would never of had face work done, it changed her look, it's taken 3 years and she still doesn't look like before, close but not quite.

I read the previous topics, sorry, I don't understand the reason why you are keeping on comparing them. Anyway, I think that they are really different, one is a real feminin woman (CC) the other looks too mannish. And also, I can see that each time some magazine such as Daily Mail, for instance, shows pictures of EC someone (maybe her or her PR) adds some comments about their similarity or similarity to another model, sometimes Ambrosio) and promptly the comment is rejected by other viewers. This happens all the time especially when there are a lot of negative comments about her. A lot of people don't like her, I've noticed that she spends her time partly posting pictures of herself and partly deleting bad comments by her followers.

I forgot to say that the person who adds the comment about their similarity is always the same person or sometimes another who use the same adjectives to describe her: "Stunning, gorgeous" the same she uses to describe other people on her account. We all know she doesn't speak English very well and that she has a poor vocabulary, probably she adds herself this kind of comment...

lucy wrote:Can't compare these two, CC had a different career than EC, she was with Revlon for along time and that was considered late in her career, she walked runways, cover for mags, what has EC done in 35 years that can compare? CC also a sharp business woman,now is doing furniture and houseware lines, she keeps working as she matures and ages. EC is a beautiful woman but with a different lifestyle, CC slowed down her parting etc. when she became a mom.EC doesn't seem to have slowed down her party. Wish CC would never of had face work done, it changed her look, it's taken 3 years and she still doesn't look like before, close but not quite.

You write: what has EC done in 35 years that can compare? Absolutely impossible to Elizabetta 35 years ago was not even born yet!

Sorry lela, thought EC was 35 or close to it.

However, when Clooney and Elisabetta were a couple in love, they were so beautiful that competed with Brad and Angelina ...