George Clooney and Stacy Keibler out to dinner with their parents

It's hard from the angle to tell if he is even kissing her, could be he is whispering something to her. If its a kiss then it seems like a friendly peck on the cheek (maybe for the sake of the paps??) His hand in his pocket doesn't really indicate an interest or passion.

Haha - maybe he's just tired of his latest girlfriends hanging all over him.

And maybe it's just the dresses she wears but she does look like she has a potbelly when she's not posing.

@Cindigirl - totally agree. When I saw this pic, I thought, if the dress designer had seen this pic first, I wonder if she would be tweeting how gorgeous SK looked in it, because here it looks horrible.

Ladies, is the "pic" that was pulled from before??? Just wondering!

fluffy, if you mean pulled from Entertainment Tonight, then yes. It's one of the pics that originally aired on that segment that later melbert said was missing on their website episode.

cindigirl wrote:

lux wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

This kiss looks more like an affectionate peck on the cheek. It's obvious they like each other but IMO doesn't go beyond just friendship.

I kiss that way all my colleagues (and there are many!) When they start the holidays. I'm thinking of being a woman easy ......... ah, ah, ah! and also how the fuck dressed Stacy? She is terrible!

This dress is a pretty color on her but it doesn't fit her very well. I agree the designer should have looked at a photo of Stacy in it and realized it didn't look flattering on her at all. Stacy has a great body I would think most things would look good on her. Also this kiss he isn't even touching her. Watching the video of him and Sarah L in the restaurant he was much more affectionate with her.

pandabear wrote:I agree the designer should have looked at a photo of Stacy in it and realized it didn't look flattering on her at all.

I totally agree with you. Also the angle the photo was taken was very unfortunate. Any side angle pic view magnifies the tummy. Unless you're a skinny model with NO tummy you're going to look like that.

Except for the fact that she is a skinny model with no tummy. It's just the cut of the dress, no big deal.

George stop being ridiculous and found a woman you love and who loves you (this woman can not even settle for this sfiorarlanon she was delivered at home that your friend in a time when perhaps you felt alone! If you're really do gay outing is better than this farce!

Now I know you're kidding Katie. I've seen skinny models on the catwalk and she's not one of them.

No I'm not kidding. Didn't you see the picture of her in a bikini a week or so ago? Her stomach was concave. She's underweight and had six pack abs.

Sorry, I really thought you were kidding. Maybe that's her six pack abs that are protruding.

Sorry, now it's me who can't tell if you're joking. It's clearly the dress that gives her that shape. This picture is from two weeks ago - you think she can in any way be described as fat or pot bellied? Yes, she's breathing in but those muscles are real.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Then it must be the dress. I just know I'm underweight and I look great from the front but a side view, not so great.

I think she should donate that dress to Goodwill. lol

He does love his "hands in pockets" pose.....LOL


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

I am confused why would this picture be pulled from the Entertainment tonight story, it is not so incriminating. It is not like he has his hands up her dress or down her blouse. He is kissing her on the cheek or whispering in her ear. It looks almost staged to me and they are playing it up for the paps.

lux wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

might have been a fake picture or might have been copyright issues that caused them to pull it.

As for the dress, yes she does have an con caved stomach but the dress has too much pleating at the front and the waist is to high for her which is why she looks like she has a belly. Would be a great dress if you are wanting to hide a belly but for those with con caved ones it definitely will make you look like you have a belly.

Wonder if someday we will look back and think they were affectionate?
When I look back or remember the days with SL, I think George was in love, well maybe infatuation and lust.
He seems to try very hard to not touch his GF's in public, it must be something he has learned over the years. Like a check list after each GF, won't do that again in public.

She is a woman of great bone structure and muscles. The dress that are defective when wearing tight clothing. With the right size for her, the problem disappears.

Yes the dress is not the right size for her, it actually pulls in the back and she is to long waisted for this dress. It is not the first time she has worn a dress that is to short waisted for her long figure.

I think part of the problem is that she tries to wear short skirts to show off her legs, but her torso is long so she ends up with clothes that don't fit well across the middle. With the money she's spending on those clothes, you'd think a few bucks to a tailor to make sure they fit right wouldn't be too much.

Judging by this photo GTC doesn't seem too worried about the fit of this dress...............

I think the pics of eli and steve on the beach look like a couple in love being affectionate with each other. Don't think its related to george giving his friend a peck on the cheek.

lux wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Wow! wow! WOW! I can't wait for Way2old4dis to analyze this!

My observations:

• Hands in his pocket - I think hands in the pocket means he is hiding something!?

• His crotch is turned outward or away from her. Perhaps that just means little George is trying to escape from the Jolly Green Giant!?

• The toes - they seem to be going toe to toe literally. Seems strange.

Lastly, like a good famewhore, Stacy seems more concerned with spotting the paps.

And if you look closely, his right hand is hovering just near the strap of her handbag, behind her bum (his fingers catch the sunlight just to the right of the glasses on the table). It's not like she caught him unawares with his hands in his pockets. The way his hand is positioned, he could easily pull her closer or rest his hand on her hip, or touch her AT ALL, if he wanted to.

I googled body language secrets -

Reading the "Hands in Pocket" Body Language

Don't Put Your Hands Where They Don't Belong


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]A person putting his hands in his pocket may either exhibit any of the following body language signals:

1) He may be nervous, anxious or uncomfortable with the situation.

2) He may be hiding something from you.

3) He may be restraining himself from doing a specific action or movement.

4) He may be bored, inattentive, or uninterested.

Lakin460 wrote:I googled body language secrets -

Reading the "Hands in Pocket" Body Language

Don't Put Your Hands Where They Don't Belong


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]A person putting his hands in his pocket may either exhibit any of the following body language signals:

1) He may be nervous, anxious or uncomfortable with the situation.

2) He may be hiding something from you.

3) He may be restraining himself from doing a specific action or movement.

4) He may be bored, inattentive, or uninterested.

AHA! It must be #3; he's so crazy about her he has to restrain himself from grabbing her, throwing her up against the wall, and having his way with her.

NO, No, no Missa! It's #2!!!!! He's pulling out the engagement ring!!! But, the paps only had permission for so long, and as soon as they left, he pulled his hand out with a beautiful little box with a 3,000 carat diamond ring in it!!!! Case solved!!!!

OR
it is probably #1 and #4

Or maybe he is restraining himself from throwing Stacy in the lake?!?

I'd go with number 4.

She doesn't look like she wants to be near him either, judging from the look on her face.

lux wrote:[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Think the hand near the a** is part of the POSE. Ladies these pics was a pic op done to make it look like they were just taking a stroll around Laglio and "oh no! they got caught by the paps making out."

Think these were professional pics sold to one web site to be sold to gossip sites who would then make up the stories but a few well placed ones from the camp would start the general trend. And the designer also prolly got some free ones to use. But apparently not the kissing photo.

The place in the first pic that looks like it was spliced together and copy pasted, prolly not but looks like the same area where she was with her mom and dad over by those trees in the background. It looked like the photographer tried to fade down the pic some for some reason when taking it.

And the tum incident has happened too many times for it to be an accident. Either she does have a tum and it shows up sometimes. That "six pack abs" pic clearly shows her sucking in hard. Look at the dipped in areas by each side of her tum. Would love to have seen that pic from a side angle. The upper torso looks larger than the lower tho well muscled, but the lower was the part most sucked in. Or there may be truth to it growing some... These were STAGED photos and sold to a site for gossip use. Thats what I see. Not sure why there is so much of this going on. But I do think hes keeping contractual agreement with her to help her get one of those jobs.

Pulling the kissing story? Must have been personal reasons. Nothing else makes much sense. Think maybe George changed his mind on that one as perhaps he isn't comfortable with the pose for a pic op that could get highly exploited with the first story perhaps and the way it was trending.

Lakin460 wrote:I googled body language secrets -

Reading the "Hands in Pocket" Body Language

Don't Put Your Hands Where They Don't Belong


[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]A person putting his hands in his pocket may either exhibit any of the following body language signals:

1) He may be nervous, anxious or uncomfortable with the situation.

2) He may be hiding something from you.

3) He may be restraining himself from doing a specific action or movement.

4) He may be bored, inattentive, or uninterested.

thanks, interesting


(Lakin
I prefer the previous one... not this.... ballerina )

Ok, darlin'.....you got it!

ottimo

Hmm... my totally unprofessional and subjective reading...

First, her. Not relaxed at all. Her hug comes off as more of a grab because even though she's standing toe-to-toe, she's put one arm all the way around his shoulder. That takes too much muscle effort to be spontaneous and natural. (The more natural stance would be the left hand on his chest or left shoulder, with her chest and/or pelvis relaxing into him.) And I know she's fit and muscular, but her arms and legs are tensed into position -- again, not relaxed. The fingers of her right hand are fully extended on his arms, not caressing while her left fingers are "clawed." Her lips are pursed, and her head is slightly tilted away from his instead of leaning in. She wants to be close to him, but not for love or intimacy. JMHO.

Now him. One hand in a pocket. The other, on her butt but the dominant fingers held slanted away -- and almost balled into a fist instead of open, and certainly not pulling her closer. His pelvis is pushed away from her. His knees looked locked; otherwise his body would be more fluid and flush with hers. And he's actually turned his toes in, towards each other, when a more natural stance for a couple this face-to-face would be for their feet to be closer to boy-girl-boy-girl-boy. All this says, "I'm not moving any further." Nothing intimate in the least.

Taken as a whole, it looks unnatural and uncomfortable. If it's staged, it's not helping her cause at all. The position of their faces, to me, shows he's either just saying something to her, or brushed his lips against some hidden part of her head -- not an "I'm proud to have you" kiss. Oddly (again, to me), it doesn't look like she's all that into him physically, as much as the other way around. But she wants more anyway, and he's resisting. Again, I think they like each other but aren't connected in an emotionally intimate way. There's just too much at odds between them when they're close.

Of course, this is a moment in time. They could have been all over each other in the seconds before or after this shot was taken.

Apparently, I've given George 3 feet.

Does anyone else here feel like these two got sucked into their own game? Like, they don't really want to be "together", but they can't really relax and just be friends and hang out?
When I look at this particular pic, and most of the pics that we've seen where there's the least little bit of intimacy, SK looks like she's mothering him, or taking care of Grandpa. You can tell there's some kind of affection there, but not much else.

Thanks ladies for your thoughts on this photo. And all I got out of it was her potbelly. ARE there any pics (other than her tackllng him) of him kissing her on the lips? She always seems to go for it and he just stands there. Sometimes by their body language it seems he pulls his lips away at the last second.

Bellybaby I think you make a very good point. Maybe it started as two agreeing to be together during award season given George's recent break up but the more things blossomed in the press the more they got caught up and now they feel they have to continue to play the game.

cindigirl wrote:Thanks ladies for your thoughts on this photo. And all I got out of it was her potbelly. ARE there any pics (other than her tackllng him) of him kissing her on the lips? She always seems to go for it and he just stands there. Sometimes by their body language it seems he pulls his lips away at the last second.

The only pics I've ever seen involve her putting him in a headlock and even then I don't recall the kiss ever being on the lips its always been off to the side.

Way2Old4Dis wrote: Apparently, I've given George 3 feet.

Yeah, I've heard those rumours too but maybe that's more for discussion on the package thread?

cindigirl wrote:ARE there any pics (other than her tackllng him) of him kissing her on the lips?

There's a whole bunch more from that outing but they're not released in public (yet).

I'm still not convinced they're kissing. To me this looks like a casual hug and maybe kiss on the cheek as they part ways for a few hours. In any case, there's plenty of space between them so there's nothing exceptionally emotional about it.

Way2Old4Dis,
Really appreciate your thoughtful analysis. I know that when I hug any man, I immediately put my head on his chest or shoulder. I never see SK doing this. But then I've always seen SK as more in love with the paps than with G.

Way2Old4Dis wrote:Hmm... my totally unprofessional and subjective reading...

First, her. Not relaxed at all. Her hug comes off as more of a grab because even though she's standing toe-to-toe, she's put one arm all the way around his shoulder. That takes too much muscle effort to be spontaneous and natural. (The more natural stance would be the left hand on his chest or left shoulder, with her chest and/or pelvis relaxing into him.) And I know she's fit and muscular, but her arms and legs are tensed into position -- again, not relaxed. The fingers of her right hand are fully extended on his arms, not caressing while her left fingers are "clawed." Her lips are pursed, and her head is slightly tilted away from his instead of leaning in. She wants to be close to him, but not for love or intimacy. JMHO.

Now him. One hand in a pocket. The other, on her butt but the dominant fingers held slanted away -- and almost balled into a fist instead of open, and certainly not pulling her closer. His pelvis is pushed away from her. His knees looked locked; otherwise his body would be more fluid and flush with hers. And he's actually turned his toes in, towards each other, when a more natural stance for a couple this face-to-face would be for their feet to be closer to boy-girl-boy-girl-boy. All this says, "I'm not moving any further." Nothing intimate in the least.

Taken as a whole, it looks unnatural and uncomfortable. If it's staged, it's not helping her cause at all. The position of their faces, to me, shows he's either just saying something to her, or brushed his lips against some hidden part of her head -- not an "I'm proud to have you" kiss. Oddly (again, to me), it doesn't look like she's all that into him physically, as much as the other way around. But she wants more anyway, and he's resisting. Again, I think they like each other but aren't connected in an emotionally intimate way. There's just too much at odds between them when they're close.

Of course, this is a moment in time. They could have been all over each other in the seconds before or after this shot was taken.

Watch George's neck is so tense that seems to be hard to kiss on the cheek![You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Because he's talking/whispering something to her, and she's desparately trying to hear, and they're surrounded by their parents?


A brief moment in time......

Possibly pap co-operation, so that they appease them, and can then have more time to themselves to do whatever - marry, argue, whatever

party animal - not! wrote:Because he's talking/whispering something to her, and she's desparately trying to hear, and they're surrounded by their parents?


A brief moment in time......

Possibly pap co-operation, so that they appease them, and can then have more time to themselves to do whatever - marry, argue, whatever

Sorry but I don't understand you write:" she's desparately trying to hear" but he is talking in her ear ............... but stacy is deaf?

George Clooney sells kiss for 350,000 Dollars
von jafethmariani @ 24/05/2007 - 23:24:12
But a good end to the fight against AIDS, George Clooney auctioned off a kiss to `annual Cinema Against AIDS dinner, which was sold for 350,000 dollars!
In this kiss George was more involved and it was a kiss on sale ................ poor Stacy! [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

In 2007 ?


PS.....no tongues apparently

Over the years I've been a stalker of GTC, IMO he becomes less and less natural with his ladies. Think it's because he knows from past experience that there will be all kinds of people analyzing everything about the photo/vid, so he is guarded not showing any real clues to how he may feel towards the women of the moment. But if he has a women in nis daily life for a year or more, I'd like to believe he cares for her and it's not just about his career. Maybe one day he may want a women in his life for longer than a year or two, if so I hope to see him less guarded. This is my silly romantic fantasy for some lucky woman.