Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

by party animal - not! Mon 05 Oct 2015, 12:54

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

by carolhathaway Mon 05 Oct 2015, 13:58

On Doughty Street Chambers website Amal today posted a paper:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I guess it's related to the press conference today.

Sorry, I'm on my tablet and can't post the whole article/paper.

UN Working Group Finds Detention of Mohamed Nasheed Arbitrary and Urges his Immediate Release

UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Unanimously Finds Detention of Former Maldivian President Mohamed Nasheed in Violation of International Law; Urges His Immediate Release

Today, the legal team of former President Mohamed Nasheed – Amal Clooney of Doughty Street Chambers, Jared Genser of Freedom Now and [url=https://www.matrixlaw.co.uk/Members/49/Ben Emmerson.aspx]Ben Emmerson QC[/url] of Matrix Chambers – released Opinion No. 33/2015 (The Maldives) of the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. In its decision, the Working Group concluded that:

"The deprivation of liberty of Mr. Nasheed, being in contravention of articles 9, 10, 19, 20, and 21 of the UDHR [Universal Declaration on Human Rights] and articles 9, 14, 19, 22, and 25 of the ICCPR [International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights], is arbitrary, falling within categories I, II, III, and V of the categories applicable to the consideration of cases . . . the Working Group requests the Government . . . release Mr.Nasheed immediately and accord him an enforceable right to compensation . . ."

An independent and impartial specialist body of the UN Human Rights Council, the Working Group consists of experts from Australia, Benin, Mexico, South Korea and Ukraine. The Government and its legal team, led by Cherie Blair QC, submitted a 111-page response with 48 annexes to President Nasheed’s original petition, arguing that the trial, conviction and sentence should be considered legal under domestic and international law. In reaching its conclusion, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention upheld the legal arguments made by President’s counsel, and rejected all the arguments filed by the Government seeking to justify Nasheed’s show trial.

Highlights of the Working Group’s decision are as follows.

In relation to Category I, which relates to the lack of a basis for President Nasheed’s detention, it concluded (at paras 94-5) that:

"The Working Group notes that detention will be considered arbitrary when it is clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty. The Working Group respectfully disagrees with the Government’s assertion that since Mr. Nasheed was convicted by a Maldivian court in accordance with Maldivian law, this precludes the case falling within Category I . . . In an offence as serious as terrorism, which in the Maldives carries a sentence between 10 to 15 years of imprisonment or banishment for Terrorist acts which do not result in the loss of life, the Government should have been able to demonstrate the legal basis of the charges . . . the Government has not explained how the arrest of Judge Abdulla, which was carried out by the MNDF (Maldives National Defence Forces) under an order given by a third party, could constitute terrorism . . . the Government has also failed to rebut the assertion by the source that there was no evidence produced at the trial that Mr. Nasheed had ordered Judge Abdulla’s arrest. The Working Group considers that it is therefore clearly impossible to invoke any legal basis justifying the deprivation of liberty of Mr. Nasheed . . ."

With regards to Categories II and V, which relate to President Nasheed’s detention in retaliation for the exercise of his rights to freedom of opinion and expression, association, and political participation, the Working Group concluded (at para 97) that:

"In the view of the Working Group, there are several factors which, taken together, strongly suggest that Mr. Nasheed’s conviction was politically motivated. These include: (i) the history and pattern of proceedings brought against Mr. Nasheed, including his arrest and detention in 1994 which was declared by the Working group to be arbitrary and solely motivated by the will to suppress his critical voice, (ii) the sudden way in which charges were reinstituted against Mr. Nasheed after the original case had been inactive for 2.5 years when the Government lost a key coalition partner in the parliament, (iii) the fact that, two weeks after Mr. Nasheed was sentenced, the Government adopted a law banning all prisoners from being members of political parties, and (iv) the fact that Mr. Nasheed will not be able to participate in the 2018 presidential election as a result of his conviction. In this case, the Working Group considers that Mr. Nasheed’s detention has resulted from the exercise of his rights as a political opposition leader to express views contrary to the Government, to associate with his own and other political parties, and to participate in public life in Maldives . . . The Working Group concludes . . . that he was targeted on the basis of his political opinions."

And with regards to Category III, which relates to violations of due process of law, the Working Group concluded (at paras 103-105) that:

"[T]here were several serious due process violations which, taken together, demonstrate that Mr. Nasheed did not receive a fair trial . . . The violations include:

(i) the fact that 20 days elapsed between Mr. Nasheed’s arrest and conviction. . . and proceedings commenced the day after Mr. Nasheed’s arrest, suggesting that the result was pre-determined;

(ii) an apparent conflict of interest on the part of the Prosecutor General and two of the three presiding judges who were friends and colleagues of Judge Abdulla . . .

(iii) refusal to allow Mr. Nasheed to call any witnesses or evidence, and the limits placed on his cross-examination of prosecution witnesses;

(iv) limited provision of evidence to the defence team, including CDs and video evidence;

(v) the absence of legal representation for Mr. Nasheed at key points during the trial;

(vi) refusal of adjournment after the withdrawal of Mr. Nasheed’s counsel;

(vii) limitations on how many observers and members of the public could attend Mr. Nasheed’s trial . . .

(viii) a sudden change by the Supreme Court of the appeal rules, and the delay in providing the trial record to the defence . . ."

In a statement released by the Maldivian Foreign Ministry on the Opinion, the Government of the Maldives stated that it “does not accept the decision of the WGAD.” It claimed that the decision of the Working Group “failed to address a number of salient points submitted” and “makes little reference to the submissions made and therefore the question must be asked as to whether the WGAD has given the Governments [sic] submission due attention during its deliberation.” Yet a review of the Working Group’s 21-page decision shows it fully considered the Government’s arguments. Indeed, in a section entitled “Response from the Government,” the Working Group presented the elements of the Government’s claims in 23 elaborate paragraphs. The Working Group then proceeded in its discussion to analyze the application of international law to the facts of the case, after a thorough review of the arguments and evidence put forward by both sides.

In response to the Working Group opinion, Laila Ali, wife of former President Nasheed, stated:

“We all knew that my husband’s trial was politically motivated. The Government is trying to silence him and crush the political opposition. Now that the Working Group has ruled that my husband’s imprisonment is in violation of international law, my daughters and I are looking forward to being reunited with him soon.”

Amal Clooney added:

“This UN opinion was rendered by an independent group of experts after full consideration of the legal arguments presented by international lawyers on both sides. It upholds every legal argument put forward on behalf of President Nasheed, and flatly rejects the Government’s myths and denials. The Government fully engaged with the legal process that led to this UN decision, and must now abide by the recommendations that have been made. It must immediately release President Nasheed, in accordance with the UN Working Group’s opinion.”

And Jared Genser further emphasized:

“President Nasheed has repeatedly emphasized that his ongoing detention is merely symbolic of a broad set of ongoing abuses in the Maldives. We demand the immediate release of President Nasheed and all political prisoners in the Maldives. And we urge the Government to drop charges against the 1,700 people facing imprisonment for their non-violent exercise of their rights to free speech and peaceful assembly.”

And Ben Emmerson adds:

“Now that we have the Working Group opinion in hand, we will next seek immediate action by governments around the world, urging them to impose travel bans and targeted sanctions against individuals who are guilty of serious human-rights abuses in the Maldives. And we will work through multilateral institutions to make clear to the Government that it can no longer act with impunity.”

Hisaan Hussein, Counsel to President Nasheed, states:

“Under the constitution of Maldives it is binding upon the government of the Maldives to enforce its legal obligation under treaties to which it is a state party, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The government of the Maldives must therefore release President Nasheed immediately and abide by its international commitments to uphold human rights and democracy in the Maldives.”

Hassan Lateef, Counsel to President Nasheed, concluded:

“The government of Maldives must abide by its international commitments. We do not want to become a pariah state and for Maldivians to bear the consequences of this. The Government must immediately release President Nasheed to restore the international standing of our nation.”

by party animal - not! Mon 05 Oct 2015, 14:02

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by party animal - not! Mon 05 Oct 2015, 14:06

Youtube on the Press Conference:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by party animal - not! Mon 05 Oct 2015, 15:12

from the triple date thread........

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Business as usual! Amal Clooney is suited and booted as she heads out to work in elegant pinstriped ensemble

She enjoyed a fun-filled weekend with her husband George Clooney and his A-list pals.

But it was back to work for Amal Clooney on Monday morning, and the human rights lawyer was looking the picture of professionalism as she emerged on the streets on London in a smart pinstriped suit.

The 37-year-old star was dressed to impress in her chic suit jacket and tailored trousers as she headed out for a busy day.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Smart suit: Amal Clooney looked amazing in a pinstriped jacket and trousers as she headed out to work in London on Monday morning
Amal paired her striped separates with a white shirt, nude stilettos and an oversized leather handbag.

The style-savvy star added a touch of glamour to her ensemble thanks to the leopard print lining of her jacket and some sparkling drop earrings.

The star, who celebrated her first wedding anniversary on September 27, styled her brunette locks in voluminous curls and opted for natural make-up.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Leggy look: The 37-year-old human rights lawyer accentuated her slender legs with nude stilettos
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Demure look: Amal paired her chic trouser suit with a simple white shirt, worn tucked into her waistband
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Wild touch: The star's suit jacket featured a bold leopard print lining, adding an element of glamour to the look
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Back to work: The lawyer enjoyed a fun-filled weekend in the capital with husband George, Matt Damon and his wife Luciana Barroso, and Cindy Crawford and her husband Rande Gerber

Amal was attending a press conference where she spoke as part of the legal team for deposed Maldives president Mohamed Nasheed.

The event was held following the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention unanimously finding the detention of Nasheed at Maafushi Prison in the Maldives, where he is serving a 13-year sentence for counts of terrorism, in violation of international law.

The charge relates to the ordering of the arrest of an allegedly corrupt judge when Nasheed was still president in 2012.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Casual outing: The A-list stars paid a visit to the Electric Cinema in Notting Hill on Saturday
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

One-year anniversary: Amal and George celebrated the landmark occasion on September 27
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Finishing touches: The star completed her outfit with a pair of sparkling earrings and an oversized handbag
Amal's high profile outing comes after she enjoyed a cinema trip with Matt Damon and his spouse Luciana Barroso, and Cindy Crawford and her husband Rande Gerber at the Electric Cinema in Notting Hill on Saturday.

Onlookers were amazed by the A-list crowd's outing at the popular cinema, following a whirlwind week in London for all three couples.

Matt - who has starred in several films with his friend George over the years - was in London for the premiere of his new film The Martian, while Rande and the Hollywood star have been busy promoting their Casamingos Tequila company.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Legal battle: Amal was attending a press conference as part of her role representing deposed Maldives president Mohamed Nasheed
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Show of support: The international legal team was joined by Laila Ali, Nasheed's wife
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Passionate defence: The event comes after the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention unanimously finding the detention of the former president in violation of international law
It's of course no surprise that said liquor company just sponsored the launch party for Cindy's new memoir, Becoming, in London on Thursday.

Meanwhile, George, 54, recently opened up about his wedding anniversary with Amal, revealing he treated his partner to a fancy dinner.

‘This is the paper anniversary, you don’t want to go too crazy on the first. You got a lot more to do,’ he said.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Speaking out: Writing in the Guardian in a piece titled 'An innocent man and the Maldives' great hope', Amal called the 2013 conviction of Nasheed 'a politically motivated show trial' Read more
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
In charge: The British-Lebanese barrister has replaced Nasheed's former defense lawyer Mahfooz Saeed in the fight for his freedom
[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Detained: The former head of state is currently serving a 13-year sentence for counts of terrorism at Maafushi Prison in the Maldives

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
High profile event: Amal posed alongside the First Lady of the Maldives for a series of photos

by Nicky80 Mon 05 Oct 2015, 20:51

PAN i moved your post here

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by party animal - not! Mon 05 Oct 2015, 22:02

Thank you, Nicky

A brilliant interview by Christiane Amanpour giving in a few minutes every key aspect in this case

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

by Hebe Tue 06 Oct 2015, 02:16

Thanks PAN for all these articles. Good to see that this is getting publicity and I hope it makes a difference.

by Sponsored content

Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

UN working group finds detention of Mohamed Nasheed Arbitrary

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015

Re: Amal Clooney at press conference on imprisoned Pres Nasheed London 5. Oktober 2015